Hotel Vintage Park - a Kimpton Hotel, Seattle, Restaurant

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » Washington » Seattle Destinations » Seattle Hotels » Hotel Vintage Park - a Kimpton Hotel

OpinionWell
Rank

19th

Out of 267

Hotel Vintage Park - a Kimpton Hotel	Average Price: $158 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

1100 Fifth Avenue

Seattle, 98101 View map

4-Star Hotel Rank: 11 of 20
Average review rating: 4.2

OpinionWell Value Index: 6

Traveler reviews analyzed: Expedia (80) , MyTravelGuide (319) , Priceline (361) , Travelocity (4) , TripAdvisor (450) , YahooTravel (9)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (2/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	Recent comments complained about noise.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	Recent comments complained about parking fees.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

amenity (39) bar (46) bath (14) bathroom (131) bed (157) breakfast (64) charge (20) check in (52) check out (14) closet (31) complimentary (63) concierge (45) cost (32) deal (26) decor (47) dinner (55) downtown (168) fee (17) food (49) front desk (109) hotel (1054) housekeeping (15) lobby (178) location (357) mini bar (11) mini-bar (21) money (18) parking (154) pillow (28) pool (15) price (81) rate (53) recommend (75) restaurant (248) room (955) room service (35) service (190) shower (28) staff (404) street (84) suite (29) to park (10) towel (13) valet (67) valet parking (33) value (36) view (82) walk (126) waterfront (35) wireless (37)

Restaurant

Appears in 248 comments.

91% wrote positive comments about restaurant

The following words were used in comments with Restaurant:
excellent (23) food (18) friendly (17) good (45) great (43) hotel (71) location (30) nice (27)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. The restaurant is outstanding whether or not you stay here.

"A boutique hotel with soft edges " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/2/2012 Vote

2. It is also in an excellent location and has a very good restaurant.

"Glad we came back " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/29/2012 Vote

3. Excellent location, an outstanding restaurant, and beautiful rooms make this the perfect place to stay in downtown.

"Always excellent " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/26/2012 Vote

4. The connected Italian restaurant is also good.

"Nice hotel in a great location " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/21/2012 Vote

5. Tulio is a lovely restaurant and even though I have been traveling to Seattle for over 30 years I have never eaten there.

"Five-star stay at this Hotel " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/27/2012 Vote

6. Everyone from the front desk to the restaurant was truly pleasant and helpful, like they were really glad we were there.

"Great hotel with matching service " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/15/2012 Vote

7. The restaurant Tulio's is in my opinion the best Italian and one of the best restaurants in Seattle.

"Hotel Vintage Park " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/13/2012 Vote

8. This hotel was excellent in every way: lots of smiles, nice staff, nice room, nice amenities, nice 'extras', great restaurant (and I am a food and drink snob).

"Wonderful and warm " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/12/2012 Vote

9. The rooms are clean and well maintained, the restuarant is top notch (best roast chicken I have ever had in a restaurant.

"My home away from home in Seattle! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/12/2012 Vote

10. The rooms are clean and have a great ambiance, the location is very convenient to walk downtown or to all the great restaurants in the area.

"After many pleasant stays... " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/8/2012 Vote