Hotel Vintage Park - a Kimpton Hotel, Seattle, Complimentary

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » Washington » Seattle Destinations » Seattle Hotels » Hotel Vintage Park - a Kimpton Hotel

OpinionWell
Rank

19th

Out of 267

Hotel Vintage Park - a Kimpton Hotel	Average Price: $158 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

1100 Fifth Avenue

Seattle, 98101 View map

4-Star Hotel Rank: 11 of 20
Average review rating: 4.2

OpinionWell Value Index: 6

Traveler reviews analyzed: Expedia (80) , MyTravelGuide (319) , Priceline (361) , Travelocity (4) , TripAdvisor (450) , YahooTravel (9)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (2/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	Recent comments complained about noise.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	Recent comments complained about parking fees.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

amenity (39) bar (46) bath (14) bathroom (131) bed (157) breakfast (64) charge (20) check in (52) check out (14) closet (31) complimentary (63) concierge (45) cost (32) deal (26) decor (47) dinner (55) downtown (168) fee (17) food (49) front desk (109) hotel (1054) housekeeping (15) lobby (178) location (357) mini bar (11) mini-bar (21) money (18) parking (154) pillow (28) pool (15) price (81) rate (53) recommend (75) restaurant (248) room (955) room service (35) service (190) shower (28) staff (404) street (84) suite (29) to park (10) towel (13) valet (67) valet parking (33) value (36) view (82) walk (126) waterfront (35) wireless (37)

Complimentary

Appears in 63 comments.

100% wrote positive comments about complimentary

The following words were used in comments with Complimentary:
arrival (6) chocolate (4) coffee (15) enjoy (3) friendly (5) great (8) hot (5) hotel (10) lobby (15) location (4) nice (8) night (7) offers (6) reception (7) room (8) service (7) staff (6) tasteful (21) touch (4) wine (44)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. In the morning, complimentary coffee and tea was available.

"Service made it great.. " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/22/2012 Vote

2. Also, if you're a member, you get complimentary wifi, a nice touch.

"Service made it great.. " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/22/2012 Vote

3. There's also a 24 hour fitness centre that is complimentary.

"Service made it great.. " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/22/2012 Vote

4. A particularly nice touch was the complimentary wine tasting offered every evening - a great way to start a short visit to town.

"Awesome hotel " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/20/2012 Vote

5. Rooms were clean and they offered complimentary leopard-print bathrobes.

"Cozy! Cute hotel, good location " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/24/2012 Vote

6. There is a good coffee service in the morning, and a complimentary wine tasting in the afternoon.

"Nice hotel in a great location " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/21/2012 Vote

7. Another plus is the fact that they have a complimentary coffee service from 6-9 every morning, and a Washington State wine reception in the lobby from 5pm to 6pm every day.

"Friendly, but overrated as a boutique hotel " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/27/2012 Vote

8. They also have a great complimentary wine hour between 5-6 every day.

"Great Stay, great price " Read full review on TripAdvisor 1/30/2012 Vote

9. All Kimpton hotels have a social hour from 5-6pm where guests can have a complimentary glass of wine.

"Boutique hotel with little extras " Read full review on TripAdvisor 1/5/2012 Vote

10. They also serve complimentary tea/coffe/hot chocolate in the mornings in the lobby.

"Cute boutique hotel " Read full review on TripAdvisor 1/3/2012 Vote