Hilton Hotel Milwaukee City Center, Milwaukee, Clean

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » Wisconsin » Milwaukee Destinations » Milwaukee Hotels » Hilton Hotel Milwaukee City Center

OpinionWell
Rank

6th

Out of 114

Hilton Hotel Milwaukee City Center	Average Price: $185 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

509 West Wisconsin Avenue

Milwaukee, 53203 View map

3-Star Hotel Rank: 4 of 28
Average review rating: 3.14

OpinionWell Value Index: 6

Traveler reviews analyzed: BedBugRegistry (6) , Expedia (63) , Travelocity (10) , TripAdvisor (400) , YahooTravel (28)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (2/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	There are recent comments about Construction, Remodeling, Renovation.
Noise:	Recent comments complained about noise.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

accommodating (11) amazing (8) awesome (9) beautiful (56) best (29) better (54) big (39) cares (24) cheaper (11) clean (154) cleanliness (9) comfortable (107) comfy (12) convenient (38) cool (16) courteous (9) decent (23) elegant (9) enjoyable (9) excellent (43) exceptional (18) fantastic (12) fast (9) free (52) fresh (8) friendly (112) fun (14) good (155) gorgeous (10) great (256) happy (20) helpful (111) huge (26) liked (129) love (29) new (48) newer (9) nice (256) outstanding (8) perfect (19) pleasant (26) pleased (11) plenty (28) professional (17) quiet (30) reasonable (31) reasonably (9) spacious (26) welcoming (16) wonderful (22)

Clean

Appears in 191 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Clean:
area (9) bathroom (23) bed (29) comfortable (29) friendly (11) good (7) great (16) hotel (24) location (8) nice (34) not (24) old (8) room (135) shower (8) size (9) small (8) spacious (10) staff (18) updated (10) well (13)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. Room was clean and big, quiet, plenty of outlets.

"Vintage " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/3/2012 Vote

2. Room was clean, bed was comfortable, real Starbucks onsite.

"Wonderful Stay " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/25/2012 Vote

3. Daily cleaning was minimal and often incomplete.

"Doesn't measure up " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/23/2012 Vote

4. However, our room was well-kept, clean, and quiet with a nice desk ready for laptops, good amenities in the bathroom, excellent pillows, and a new television with a high-definition screen.

"An older hotel with nice rooms " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/23/2012 Vote

5. I know they are very busy trying to clean all the rooms for the weekend, but there should be a better way to know what rooms are still occupied and which are empty.

"Beautiful Hotel, Friendly Service!! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/23/2012 Vote

6. Our room was clean with modern decor.

"Great location. Would stay there again. " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/17/2012 Vote

7. The bed was extremely comfortable and the room was sparkling clean and quiet.

"Centrally located with great service " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/16/2012 Vote

8. Doorman and front desk were friendly, corner room was very nice with clean comfortable bedding and Miller Time Bar & Grill burgers were delicious.

"Easily a "Very Good" rating but.... " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/11/2012 Vote

9. First, hotel common areas were clean, ornate, convenient to Miller Park and downtown restaurants.

"Easily a "Very Good" rating but.... " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/11/2012 Vote

10. The rooms are clean and nicely furnished albeit, small harkening back to a different era.

"Updated old classic hotel " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/30/2012 Vote