Red Roof Inn Miami, Miami, Clean

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » Florida » Miami Destinations » Miami Hotels » Red Roof Inn Miami

OpinionWell
Rank

61st

Out of 468

Red Roof Inn Miami	Average Price: $91 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

3401 NorthWest Lejeune Road

Miami, 33142-5628 View map

2-Star Hotel Rank: 7 of 118
Average review rating: 2.54

OpinionWell Value Index: 4

Traveler reviews analyzed: BedBugRegistry (1) , Expedia (40) , MyTravelGuide (8) , Travelocity (13) , TripAdvisor (215) , YahooTravel (9)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (2/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	Recent comments complained about noise.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	Recent comments complained about bed bugs.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

acceptable (5) accommodating (3) adequate (5) affordable (6) appropriate (3) awesome (5) beautiful (8) best (9) better (31) big (18) cares (9) clean (119) cleanliness (8) comfortable (40) complementary (5) convenient (21) correct (3) courteous (8) decent (7) efficient (7) excellent (14) exceptional (4) fancy (6) fast (11) free (102) fresh (11) friendly (57) good (101) great (89) happy (6) helpful (79) huge (8) impressed (4) liked (56) love (12) luxury (6) new (26) nice (72) perfect (7) pleasant (13) pleased (3) positive (5) professional (4) prompt (4) quiet (11) reasonable (5) reasonably (3) soft (3) welcoming (7) wonderful (11)

Clean

Appears in 134 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Clean:
airport (10) bathroom (9) bed (18) breakfast (9) comfortable (16) desk (7) fresh (6) good (7) hotel (23) large (7) nice (24) not (36) pool (9) price (9) quiet (6) room (102) service (9) smell (7) staff (9) well (7)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. The rooms have recently been renovated and they are large, clean and comfortable.

"Nice rooms...thats it. " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/15/2012 Vote

2. We also felt that it wasn't as clean as it should have been.

"Just Okay " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/11/2012 Vote

3. My family and I stayed for 3 nights; the room was clean and recently renovated (but it seemed they did that in a hurry, shower curtain didn't close, so you left a big watery mess everytime you showered; the hosing for the AC unit was visible, and small finishing details).

"Not as good as the first time... " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/24/2012 Vote

4. Hotel was clean and fairly new remdoeling in our room but.

"Soaked luggage!! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/23/2012 Vote

5. Good bits:Wifi with fairly good bandwidthPool is nice with clean furniture to enjoy the highway air if you choose.

"Nice rooms " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/3/2012 Vote

6. Rooms are clean, the AC is a tad noisy so some team mates reported their sleep was not as smooth as they'd hoped (we numbered 15 last time) -- it fills the bill as handy to the airport.

"Location, location and price - a good value for that! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/1/2012 Vote

7. The rooms were clean and freshly updated and looked fantastic.

"Incredible Stay " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/27/2012 Vote

8. good service, clean, close to food, some coffee options at least and a bite of breakie if you like - not bad.

"Once I found it - it was great... " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/25/2012 Vote

9. The room was very nice and clean and the welcoming was very warm.

"my stay " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/23/2012 Vote

10. In the hotel business, clean rooms and comfortable beds will only get you so far.

"lacking service " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/17/2012 Vote