Wingate Inn Jacksonville South, Jacksonville, Happy

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » Florida » Jacksonville Destinations » Jacksonville Hotels » Wingate Inn Jacksonville South

OpinionWell
Rank

40th

Out of 213

Wingate Inn Jacksonville South	Average Price: $92 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

4681 Lenoir Avenue South

Jacksonville, 32216 View map

3-Star Hotel Rank: 20 of 42
Average review rating: 4.24

OpinionWell Value Index: 1

Traveler reviews analyzed: Expedia (26) , Travelocity (3) , TripAdvisor (58) , YahooTravel (8)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (0/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	No recent comments about noise were found.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

above average (2) acceptable (1) adequate (4) affordable (3) amazing (2) awesome (1) best (3) better (10) big (3) cares (1) clean (56) cleanliness (1) comfortable (18) comfy (4) convenient (4) courteous (4) decent (7) efficient (1) excellent (10) exceptional (1) fantastic (2) free (15) fresh (3) friendly (20) good (44) great (22) happy (6) helpful (19) huge (1) impressed (3) liked (8) love (3) new (3) nice (41) outstanding (4) pleasant (7) pleased (6) plenty (6) professional (2) quiet (14) reasonable (3) roomy (2) smoke free (1) soft (2) spacious (7) suitable (1) superb (1) tremendous (1) well appointed (1) wonderful (4)

Happy

Appears in 10 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Happy:
breakfast (4) hot (2) hotel (2) not (2) pool (2) room (4) staff (2)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

1. Because we were there just for the night, we did not explore other facilities, but we were happy to chose this hotel.

"pleasant surprise " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/13/2012 Vote

2. It is easily accessible from local major routes,and highway I 95All Reception staff were pleasant, happy, and helpful.

"Quiet Affordable Comfort. " Read full review on TripAdvisor 12/27/2009 Vote

3. We stayed at this hotel for UNF orientation and loved it - indoor hot tub, outdoor pool, workout room, buffet hot and cold breakfast, happy hour during the week, very soft comfy beds and super staff.

"Unbelievable amenities at a great price. " Read full review on TripAdvisor 7/26/2009 Vote

4. Again I said we would be happy to turn it when they get there, but why should we turn it before they do? He said "because its a community tv" and its TRADITION to put the gators on, and that we have a TV in our room to use.

"Desk clerk was a complete jerk, manager didn't care. " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/28/2009 Vote

5. Again we said ok and we're happy to turn the game on when they arrive.

"Desk clerk was a complete jerk, manager didn't care. " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/28/2009 Vote

6. I was very happy with my stay.

"Great place for the money " Read full review on Travelocity 10/1/2008 Vote

7. happy hour and breakfast are included.

"Excellent Value " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/21/2007 Vote

8. happy hour and breakfast are included.

"Excellent Value " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/21/2007 Vote

9. The breakfast and happy hour at Wingate are adequate and do not compare to the Embassy Suites, however, for my money I would rather stay at Wingate.

"Back to the Wingate again and again " Read full review on TripAdvisor 9/25/2005 Vote

10. We were seemingly accomodated and very happy until we got into the room that was overlooking the very loud pool area, which you could hear quite clearly in the room.

"We`re not impressed! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 7/22/2005 Vote