Columbus Days Inn, Columbus, Quiet

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » Ohio » Columbus Destinations » Columbus Hotels » Columbus Days Inn

OpinionWell
Rank

114th

Out of 202

Columbus Days Inn	Average Price: $59 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

1212 East Dublin Granville Road

Columbus, 43229 View map

2-Star Hotel Rank: 44 of 84
Average review rating: 2.45

OpinionWell Value Index: NA

Traveler reviews analyzed: BedBugRegistry (4) , Expedia (23) , MyTravelGuide (8) , TripAdvisor (39) , YahooTravel (9)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (0/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	No recent comments about noise were found.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

acceptable (1) affordable (1) better (1) cares (2) clean (37) comfortable (3) comfy (1) correct (1) decent (1) fast (1) free (4) fresh (1) friendly (8) good (11) great (6) happy (2) helpful (6) huge (1) liked (12) new (3) nice (14) pleased (2) positive (2) quiet (1) responsive (1) roomy (1) soft (3) wonderful (2)

Quiet

Appears in 3 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Quiet:
comfortable (2) room (2)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

1. My room was clean, quiet and very comfortable.

"Great Service " Read full review on Expedia 6/24/2009 Vote

2. The location was surprisingly quiet and near several restaurants.

Read full review on MyTravelGuide 6/30/2008 Vote

3. The room was quiet, comfortable, and well appointed.

"Pleasant Stay " Read full review on TripAdvisor 12/2/2003 Vote