Howard Johnson Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Correct

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » Ohio » Cincinnati Destinations » Cincinnati Hotels » Howard Johnson Cincinnati

OpinionWell
Rank

149th

Out of 150

Howard Johnson Cincinnati	Average Price: $68 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

5410 Ridge Avenue

Cincinnati, 45213 View map

2-Star Hotel Rank: 39 of 40
Average review rating: 2.43

OpinionWell Value Index: NA

Traveler reviews analyzed: Expedia (14) , TripAdvisor (15) , YahooTravel (5)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (0/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	No recent comments about noise were found.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

affordable (1) best (2) better (1) big (2) clean (10) comfortable (1) convenient (1) correct (1) decent (2) exceptional (1) extraordinary (1) free (2) fresh (1) friendly (4) fun (1) generous (1) good (6) great (5) happy (1) helpful (3) liked (8) nice (3) professional (1) secure (1) spacious (1) upside (1)

Correct

Appears in 2 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Correct:

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

1. I mean come on if you`re going to say stuff like that atleast come up with the correct racial slur.

"WELCOME TO THE BIG JOHNSON, YOU JUST GOT SCREWED! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 7/3/2008 Vote

2. Management made every effort to, and did, correct it the next day without projecting an 'attitude'.

"Very good value and pleasant experience " Read full review on TripAdvisor 10/11/2004 Vote