Rodeway Inn San Francisco, San Francisco, Attractive

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » California » San Francisco Destinations » San Francisco Hotels » Rodeway Inn San Francisco

OpinionWell
Rank

202nd

Out of 493

Rodeway Inn San Francisco	Average Price: $117 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

101 9th Street

San Francisco, 94103 View map

1-Star Hotel Rank: 2 of 4
Average review rating: 3.18

OpinionWell Value Index: NA

Traveler reviews analyzed: Expedia (8) , TripAdvisor (50) , YahooTravel (5)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (1/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	Recent comments complained about noise.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

acceptable (1) accommodating (1) adequate (1) attentive (2) attractive (1) best (8) better (2) big (3) cares (1) cheaper (1) cheapest (1) clean (24) comfortable (3) convenient (7) decent (1) excellent (1) fast (1) free (16) fresh (1) friendly (12) fun (1) funky (2) good (19) great (8) helpful (11) huge (1) liked (8) loved (1) newer (1) nice (6) plenty (1) professional (1) prompt (1) quiet (2) reasonable (4) secure (1) spacious (4) spotless (2) welcoming (1)

Attractive

Appears in 1 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Attractive:

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

1. Now mind you my spouse is very attractive, very kind appearing which he is deeply but there is no excuse for anyone approaching when they're not invited.

"The Worst of the Worst " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/1/2011 Vote