Holiday Inn Torrance, Torrance, Nice

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » California » Torrance Hotels » Holiday Inn Torrance

OpinionWell
Rank

3rd

Out of 18

Holiday Inn Torrance	Average Daily Rate: NA Check Rates

Hotel Class:

19800 South Vermont Avenue

Torrance, 90502 View map

3-Star Hotel Rank: 3 of 5
Average review rating: 4.36

OpinionWell Value Index: NA

Traveler reviews analyzed: Expedia (12)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (0/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	No recent comments about noise were found.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

accommodating (1) best (1) big (1) clean (4) comfortable (1) convenient (2) decent (2) excellent (1) exceptional (1) free (1) friendly (2) good (1) great (6) helpful (1) huge (1) liked (2) nice (3) outstanding (1) perfect (1) pleasant (1) professional (1) reasonable (1)

Nice	Appears in 3 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Nice:
hotel (3)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

1. This hotel was nice, clean and pleasant to stay at.

"Great Place to Stay " Read full review on Expedia 8/12/2009 Vote

2. The recommended shuttle service (South Bay something - the hotel will know) was so professional and friendly - the restaurant was nice and the food was outstanding.

"Staff was great! " Read full review on Expedia 8/11/2009 Vote

3. Overall is a nice hotel if you do not want to do anything there just sleep.

"Did not like there... " Read full review on Expedia 3/12/2009 Vote