Best Western Pheasant Hill Spokane, Spokane, Great

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » Washington » Spokane Destinations » Spokane Hotels » Best Western Pheasant Hill Spokane

OpinionWell
Rank

24th

Out of 94

Best Western Pheasant Hill Spokane	Average Price: $116 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

12415 East Mission Avenue

Spokane, 99216 View map

3-Star Hotel Rank: 12 of 21
Average review rating: 4.38

OpinionWell Value Index: 10

Traveler reviews analyzed: Expedia (52) , MyTravelGuide (8) , Travelocity (7) , TripAdvisor (52) , YahooTravel (16)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (0/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	No recent comments about noise were found.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

above average (1) accommodating (3) adequate (2) affordable (3) amazing (7) awesome (2) best (6) better (8) clean (47) cleanliness (1) comfortable (32) comfy (2) complementary (1) convenient (11) courteous (3) decent (4) excellent (3) fancy (2) fantastic (2) free (4) fresh (13) friendly (40) good (29) great (52) happy (3) helpful (23) impressed (5) liked (10) love (8) new (8) nice (54) outstanding (2) perfect (6) pleasant (7) pleased (2) plenty (4) positive (1) professional (1) quiet (11) reasonable (2) reasonably (1) roomy (1) smoke free (1) soft (2) spacious (2) suitable (1) terrific (1) welcoming (6) well appointed (1) wonderful (5)

Great

Appears in 72 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Great:
breakfast (21) clean (13) coffee (7) comfortable (5) convenient (4) experience (4) friendly (6) helpful (5) hot (6) hotel (7) location (4) nice (8) night (6) not (4) pool (13) price (6) reviews (4) room (15) staff (12) tub (4)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. Breakfast offerings better then most,with snack in the later day,great.

"Relaxing atmosphere " Read full review on Expedia 1/20/2010 Vote

2. great value, not in town (& not priced like an in town hotel) but convenient none the less.

"Excellent Value, we will return " Read full review on TripAdvisor 11/16/2009 Vote

3. Convenient location, clean, nicely kept updated, great pool and jacuzzi.

Read full review on MyTravelGuide 10/19/2009 Vote

4. They very politely let us have a late check-out and we enjoyed the pool while waiting, It was a very convenient, clean and had a great staff.

"Had a Great Stay " Read full review on Expedia 8/20/2009 Vote

5. great place to stay.

"Very Nice! " Read full review on Expedia 8/19/2009 Vote

6. Luckily the AC worked great in my new room.

"Decent hotel, but had a few issues " Read full review on TripAdvisor 8/18/2009 Vote

7. Pheasant Hill was such a great place and truly pet friendly, they treated us very well, the room was clean and comfortable and the staff were great to us and our pets.

"Great pet friendly hotel! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 8/5/2009 Vote

8. Rooms were great with plenty of space, pillow-top beds, a nice desk with comfortable chair, and of course a microwave, refrigerator, and coffee maker.

"One of Spokane Valley's finest hotels! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 7/3/2009 Vote

9. Breakfast in the morning was great and as past reviews have mentioned, the breakfast lady is nice and helpful.

"One of Spokane Valley's finest hotels! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 7/3/2009 Vote

10. Rooms were great with plenty of space, pillow-top beds, a nice desk with comfortable chair, and of course a microwave, refrigerator, and coffee maker.

"One of Spokane Valley's finest hotels! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 7/3/2009 Vote