Drury Inn and Suites Austin North, Austin, Reasonably

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » Texas » Austin Destinations » Austin Hotels » Drury Inn and Suites Austin North

OpinionWell
Rank

50th

Out of 287

Drury Inn and Suites Austin North	Average Price: $131 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

6711 IH35 NORTH

Austin, 78752 View map

3-Star Hotel Rank: 26 of 77
Average review rating: 4.05

OpinionWell Value Index: 1

Traveler reviews analyzed: BedBugRegistry (1) , Expedia (14) , Travelocity (4) , TripAdvisor (68) , YahooTravel (9)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (0/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	No recent comments about noise were found.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

above average (1) accommodating (1) adequate (5) awesome (2) best (8) better (8) big (2) cares (6) clean (41) comfortable (20) comfy (2) convenient (6) efficient (2) excellent (5) exceptional (4) fast (4) free (48) friendly (22) good (30) great (43) happy (13) helpful (15) immaculate (3) impressed (4) liked (15) love (7) luxury (2) nice (27) perfect (4) pleasant (5) plenty (5) positive (2) pressure (2) professional (3) quiet (8) reasonable (6) reasonably (2) roomy (1) secure (2) soft (3) spacious (9) spotless (2) superb (2) superior (1) swanky (1) tasteful (1) terrific (1) welcoming (1) well appointed (1) wonderful (3)

Reasonably

Appears in 10 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Reasonably:
$ (2) great (2) price (3) rating (2) reasonable (10) room (3)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

1. reasonably priced.

"Outstanding AGAIN " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/6/2012 Vote

2. Very reasonably priced, great facilities, clean rooms, great customer service.

"Loved it even better this time! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 8/21/2011 Vote

3. I booked this room at a reasonable rate of $97 on line.

"Typical Drury Inn, average room, friendly employees, free breakfast " Read full review on TripAdvisor 6/13/2011 Vote

4. Beside these small gripes, the main reason for the ranking of 4 instead of 5 is that my bed was very uncomfortable.

"One of the Best Hotels in Austin " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/14/2011 Vote

5. The reason for this long story is so I can tell you about arriving back at the Drury at midnight requesting a crib for an unexpected guest.

"One of the Best Hotels in Austin " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/14/2011 Vote

6. When we left we realized that was probably the reason for the swipe card access to the Drury parking lot and the posted bulletins about not leaving anything in your vehicle and break-ins.

"One night on our way back north, location was not good, but pet-friendly. " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/13/2011 Vote

7. I booked Drury because their price was reasonable and their location was perfect for everywhere I needed to be that weekend.

"Convenient location, so-so hotel " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/1/2009 Vote

8. Our double room was $99, which seems reasonable for the area.

"Great stay at the Drury " Read full review on TripAdvisor 9/1/2008 Vote

9. We booked our trip late and couldn`t get anything closer to downtown Austin, so after l looked on the reviews here, and saw that we got a pool and free breakfast for a fairly reasonable rate, I booked the Drury Inn for 5 nights.

"Pretty good for a stay on the I-35 " Read full review on TripAdvisor 9/19/2006 Vote

10. Also, for some reason the staff seemed to be hoarding the nonstick spray for the waffle iron.

"Good choice " Read full review on TripAdvisor 8/2/2005 Vote