La Quinta Indianapolis, Indianapolis, Luxury

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » Indiana » Indianapolis Destinations » Indianapolis Hotels » La Quinta Indianapolis

OpinionWell
Rank

64th

Out of 274

La Quinta Indianapolis	Average Price: $94 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

3880 West 92nd Street

Indianapolis, 46268 View map

2-Star Hotel Rank: 16 of 88
Average review rating: 3.48

OpinionWell Value Index: 4

Traveler reviews analyzed: Expedia (49) , MyTravelGuide (22) , Travelocity (5) , TripAdvisor (17) , YahooTravel (6)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (0/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	No recent comments about noise were found.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

acceptable (1) accommodating (1) adequate (4) affordable (2) attractive (1) beautiful (1) best (2) big (1) cares (1) clean (42) cleanliness (1) comfortable (13) convenient (4) cool (1) courteous (1) decent (2) excellent (2) fancy (1) fantastic (2) fast (2) free (4) fresh (1) friendly (14) good (23) great (10) happy (1) helpful (7) liked (4) loved (2) luxury (1) new (2) nice (24) perfect (1) pleasant (2) pleased (1) plenty (3) quiet (3) reasonable (2) reasonably (2) spectacular (1)

Luxury

Appears in 1 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Luxury:

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

1. Considering the price you pay, you cannot expect any luxury but all the basics are provided and kept clean.

"Good value for money " Read full review on Expedia 5/14/2008 Vote