La Quinta Tucson, Tucson, Complain

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » Arizona » Tucson Destinations » Tucson Hotels » La Quinta Tucson

OpinionWell
Rank

25th

Out of 278

La Quinta Tucson	Average Price: $86 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

7001 South Tucson Boulevard

Tucson, 85706 View map

2-Star Hotel Rank: 6 of 58
Average review rating: 4.19

OpinionWell Value Index: 7

Traveler reviews analyzed: Expedia (42) , MyTravelGuide (18) , Travelocity (5) , TripAdvisor (83)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (1/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	Recent comments complained about noise.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

annoy (2) awful (1) bad (5) bare (1) complain (1) complaint (3) dirt (1) dirty (4) disappoint (3) disgust (2) downside (2) expensive (2) filthy (1) hard (4) inconvenient (1) issue (5) lacking (1) loud (5) lousy (1) needs work (1) negative (3) noise (23) noisy (1) odor (2) problem (1) rough (1) slow (3) smell (4) smoker (1) stale (1) unfortunate (1) worn (1)

Complain

Appears in 2 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Complain:
clean (2)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

1. we were there for 2 1/2 days and our room was never cleaned, I complained to the front desk & all I was told was that they were busy and given clean towels.

"very disappointed " Read full review on Expedia 10/14/2009 Vote

2. We could not find one thing to complain about.

"5 stars across the board " Read full review on TripAdvisor 9/14/2005 Vote