Comfort Suites Salt Lake City, Salt Lake City, Wrong

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » Utah » Salt Lake City Destinations » Salt Lake City Hotels » Comfort Suites Salt Lake City

OpinionWell
Rank

37th

Out of 192

Comfort Suites Salt Lake City	Average Price: $117 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

171 North 2100 West

Salt Lake City, 84116 View map

3-Star Hotel Rank: 25 of 46
Average review rating: 4.09

OpinionWell Value Index: NA

Traveler reviews analyzed: MyTravelGuide (3) , Travelocity (2) , TripAdvisor (46) , YahooTravel (1)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (0/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	No recent comments about noise were found.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

avoid (1) awful (1) bad (1) complaints (2) dated (1) dingy (2) disappoint (1) expensive (1) hard (2) hardly (1) horrible (1) issue (3) lacking (2) negative (2) noise (2) noisy (1) poor (1) poorly (1) problem (2) shabby (1) shock (1) slow (1) smoker (1) unfortunate (2) worst (1) would have liked (1) wrong (1)

Wrong

Appears in 2 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Wrong:

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

1. I stayed here one night based on previous reviews at Trip Advisor which has not been wrong yet.

"Satisfies all requirements " Read full review on TripAdvisor 6/27/2009 Vote

2. When I called down to the front desk they told us how to turn the heat on thinking we had it wrong.

"rooms not that great " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/4/2006 Vote