Washington Park Inn Portland, Portland, Noisy

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » Oregon » Portland Destinations » Portland Hotels » Washington Park Inn Portland

OpinionWell
Rank

179th

Out of 287

Washington Park Inn Portland	Average Price: $49 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

840 SouthWest King Avenue

Portland, 97205 View map

2-Star Hotel Rank: 32 of 56
Average review rating: 3

OpinionWell Value Index: NA

Traveler reviews analyzed: TripAdvisor (30) , YahooTravel (5)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (0/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	No recent comments about noise were found.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

bad (5) bare (1) broken (2) chipped (1) complain (5) crappy (1) damage (3) depressing (1) dirty (1) filthy (2) gross (1) hard (2) horrible (1) lack (1) loud (1) lumpy (1) mice (1) mold (1) nightmare (1) noisy (1) rough (1) smell (1) smoker (2) stain (1) stale (1) terrible (1) uncomfortable (1) worn (2) worst (1) wrong (1)

Noisy

Appears in 2 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Noisy:

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

1. For solo travelers the rooms are on the street side and kind of noisy.

"If you can sleep on anything, stay here. " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/17/2007 Vote

2. The air conditioner, though ancient and a bit noisy, held up well against the 99 degree heat during my stay.

"amazing value- great location, slightly shabby, but CHEAP!!! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 7/28/2005 Vote