Radisson Portland, Portland, Unhappy

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » Oregon » Portland Destinations » Portland Hotels » Radisson Portland

OpinionWell
Rank

31st

Out of 287

Radisson Portland	Average Price: $94 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

6233 NorthEast 78th Court

Portland, 97218 View map

3-Star Hotel Rank: 20 of 75
Average review rating: 3.67

OpinionWell Value Index: 5

Traveler reviews analyzed: Expedia (67) , Travelocity (5) , TripAdvisor (154) , YahooTravel (13)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (0/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	No recent comments about noise were found.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

annoy (2) avoid (1) awful (4) awkward (2) bad (12) broken (4) chipped (2) complain (6) complaint (2) cramped (1) dated (2) delay (2) difficult (4) dingy (3) dirty (5) disappoint (8) disgust (2) expensive (4) hard (16) hardly (3) horrible (3) inconvenient (2) irritate (2) issue (3) loud (3) mess (2) mold (2) nasty (2) negative (4) noise (10) noisy (2) poor (2) pricey (2) problem (7) shock (3) slow (7) smell (9) stained (1) tacky (1) terrible (8) tiny (3) uncomfortable (5) unfortunate (2) unhappy (1) unhelpful (1) unsafe (1) weird (2) worn (2) worst (6) wrong (1)

Unhappy

Appears in 1 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Unhappy:

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

1. I was unhappy however about losing my glasses.

"Loved the pool and the buffets and reception " Read full review on Expedia 7/15/2009 Vote