Hampton Inn Columbus, Columbus, Smell

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » Ohio » Columbus Destinations » Columbus Hotels » Hampton Inn Columbus

OpinionWell
Rank

31st

Out of 202

Hampton Inn Columbus	Average Price: $196 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

501 North High Street

Columbus, 43215 View map

3-Star Hotel Rank: 16 of 59
Average review rating: 3.97

OpinionWell Value Index: 2

Traveler reviews analyzed: Expedia (1) , TripAdvisor (67) , YahooTravel (5)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (0/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	No recent comments about noise were found.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

bad (8) barely (1) complain (2) complaint (2) cramped (2) difficult (6) disappoint (3) downside (2) errors (1) expensive (3) frustrated (1) hard (1) inconvenient (2) irritate (1) issue (6) lacking (1) loud (2) lumpy (3) mad (1) negative (3) noise (14) noisy (1) poor (3) pricey (4) problem (8) rock (1) shabby (1) shock (1) slow (2) smell (1) stained (1) tear (1) terrible (2) too small (1) uncomfortable (2) unfriendly (1) worst (1) wrong (2)

Smell

Appears in 1 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Smell:

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

1. The comforter atop the bed was covered in freshly washed white cotton instead of the usual industrial-strength fabrics that other hotels use -- really made it feel and smell clean like home.

"excellent mid-range hotel, in best location in town " Read full review on TripAdvisor 1/8/2012 Vote