Residence Inn Charlotte, Charlotte, Hassle

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » North Carolina » Charlotte Destinations » Charlotte Hotels » Residence Inn Charlotte

OpinionWell
Rank

47th

Out of 269

Residence Inn Charlotte	Average Price: $118 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

5816 Westpark Drive

Charlotte, 28217 View map

2-Star Hotel Rank: 6 of 88
Average review rating: 3.93

OpinionWell Value Index: 1

Traveler reviews analyzed: Expedia (5) , MyTravelGuide (16) , Travelocity (3) , TripAdvisor (54)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (0/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	No recent comments about noise were found.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

bad (3) barely (1) big deal (1) bug (2) chipped (1) complain (2) complaint (2) cramped (1) dated (4) depressing (2) dirty (4) disappoint (3) disgust (1) disturbing (1) downside (1) errors (1) expensive (2) filthy (1) gross (1) hard (3) hardly (2) hassle (1) horrible (1) issue (4) lacking (1) loud (1) mildew (1) mold (1) negative (1) noise (7) noisy (2) odor (1) outdated (1) poor (2) problem (2) roach (1) rock (1) slow (1) smell (3) tiny (1) too small (2) uncomfortable (3) unfortunate (3) urine (1) worn (2) worst (1)

Hassle

Appears in 1 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Hassle:

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

1. However, I arrived late after working all day and was just too tired to deal with the hassle of moving.

"Dirty and Tired " Read full review on TripAdvisor 11/6/2007 Vote