Hampton Inn Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, Mediocre

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » North Carolina » Chapel Hill Destinations » Chapel Hill Hotels » Hampton Inn Chapel Hill

OpinionWell
Rank

11th

Out of 26

Hampton Inn Chapel Hill	Average Price: $151 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

6121 Farrington Road

Chapel Hill, 27517 View map

3-Star Hotel Rank: 5 of 6
Average review rating: 4.29

OpinionWell Value Index: NA

Traveler reviews analyzed: Expedia (12) , TripAdvisor (46) , YahooTravel (6)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (0/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	No recent comments about noise were found.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

apologetic (1) bad (3) barely (1) bed bugs (1) bugs (2) chipped (1) complaint (2) crappy (1) damper (1) dangerous (1) dated (1) disgust (1) downside (3) expensive (1) ignored (1) inconvenient (1) insects (1) issue (10) lack (1) loud (4) lumpy (1) mediocre (1) negative (3) noise (5) noisy (2) poor (1) problem (2) rude (1) shame (1) slow (1) smell (3) stained (1) stale (1) tear (1) tiny (2) uncomfortable (1) unfortunate (1) unpleasant (1) worst (1)

Mediocre

Appears in 1 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Mediocre:
breakfast (2)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

1. Where it's lacking: The included breakfast here is mediocre, even for a Hampton Inn (whose breakfasts don't compare with other brands in the chain).

"Good but not great Hampton Inn " Read full review on TripAdvisor 11/4/2011 Vote