Holiday Inn Austin, Austin, Bad

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » Texas » Austin Destinations » Austin Hotels » Holiday Inn Austin

OpinionWell
Rank

44th

Out of 287

Holiday Inn Austin	Average Price: $123 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

8901 Business Park Drive

Austin, 78759 View map

3-Star Hotel Rank: 22 of 77
Average review rating: 3.69

OpinionWell Value Index: 1

Traveler reviews analyzed: Expedia (10) , MyTravelGuide (301) , Travelocity (5) , TripAdvisor (82) , YahooTravel (7)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (1/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	Recent comments complained about noise.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

annoy (2) avoid (3) awful (2) awkward (1) bad (13) bare (1) bothersome (1) complain (4) complaint (4) dated (4) difficult (12) dingy (1) dirty (5) disappoint (2) downfall (1) expensive (4) frustrated (4) gross (1) hard (18) is a joke (1) issue (9) lack (4) loud (5) mildew (1) nasty (2) negative (5) noise (13) noisy (3) outdated (2) overpriced (3) poor (3) poorly (2) pricey (1) problem (11) ridiculous (1) rock (1) rough (1) rude (1) slow (5) smell (5) smelly (1) stained (1) terrible (4) too small (1) unbearable (1) uncomfortable (1) unfortunate (1) unpleasant (1) worst (3) wrong (3)

Bad	Appears in 26 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Bad:
$ (2) bathroom (2) carpet (2) curtain (3) difficult (2) free (2) hard (4) hotel (7) inn (2) liked (3) location (6) most (2) night (2) noise (2) not (10) pillow (2) rating (3) room (2) smell (2) smoke (4)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. It looks like bad spots have been caulked over and what was below the caulk looks like it might be starting to show again.

"Comfortable room, a bit isolated " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/29/2012 Vote

2. It is largely an unmemorable property, which is not entirely a bad thing.

"Well maintained, remodeled older property " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/23/2012 Vote

3. The location is reasonable at the corner of 183 and Loop 1/Mopac, making getting into the city not bad (20 Mins.

"Well maintained, remodeled older property " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/23/2012 Vote

4. The bathroom is in need of a renovation bad.

"Not that great of a place to stay " Read full review on TripAdvisor 6/30/2011 Vote

5. Bathroom was in pretty bad shape.

"Bathrooms need serious renovation " Read full review on TripAdvisor 10/17/2010 Vote

6. It is most difficult to really enjoy that narrow area but would work in a pinch if you just had to swim during bad weather.

"They've done the best they can with an older property " Read full review on TripAdvisor 8/15/2010 Vote

7. The pillows are half the size of a regular pillow, the hallways had a bad odor, and the noise level was excessive, even after midnight, not only because of guests, but their own lounge/bar.

"Won't Stay Again " Read full review on TripAdvisor 8/1/2010 Vote

8. Expedia map of hotel location was bad.

"The hidden hotel " Read full review on Expedia 11/4/2009 Vote

9. I don't think I would ever pay their normal rates to stay there, and not that it's a bad hotel, but if I'm going to pay $100+, I'd rather stay somewhere with a free breakfast and other amenities.

"Nothing great, nothing bad... just about what you'd expect. " Read full review on TripAdvisor 8/31/2009 Vote

10. It's sort of hard to get to, but maybe that's good -- keeps away the riffraff that write bad reviews.

"It was great for us and other family members " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/8/2009 Vote