Seal Rock Inn San Francisco, San Francisco, Mistake

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » California » San Francisco Destinations » San Francisco Hotels » Seal Rock Inn San Francisco

OpinionWell
Rank

115th

Out of 493

Seal Rock Inn San Francisco	Average Daily Rate: NA Check Rates

Hotel Class:

545 Point Lobos Avenue

San Francisco, 94121-1499 View map

3-Star Hotel Rank: 52 of 110
Average review rating: 3.46

OpinionWell Value Index: NA

Traveler reviews analyzed: BedBugRegistry (1) , TripAdvisor (77) , YahooTravel (14)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (0/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	No recent comments about noise were found.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

annoy (1) apologetic (1) bad (2) bed bugs (1) bugs (3) complain (1) complaints (1) confront (2) dated (2) difficult (2) dirt (1) dirty (10) disappoint (7) dusty (1) filthy (4) hard (1) horrible (2) ignored (1) inconvenient (1) issue (2) lack (2) miserable (1) mistake (2) mold (2) negative (5) noise (5) odor (1) outdated (3) overpriced (1) problem (6) rock (40) rude (5) sad (3) shabby (3) slow (1) smell (8) snooty (1) sub par (1) tiny (3) unbearable (1) unpleasant (1) weird (2) worn (3) would have liked (1) wrong (1)

Mistake

Appears in 3 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Mistake:

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

1. What a mistake.

"Disastor " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/6/2012 Vote

2. Huge mistake.

"Horrendous for the price! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 7/12/2009 Vote

3. probably a mistake.

"Disappointing " Read full review on TripAdvisor 10/28/2006 Vote