Beresford Arms, San Francisco, Dated

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » California » San Francisco Destinations » San Francisco Hotels » Beresford Arms

OpinionWell
Rank

80th

Out of 493

Beresford Arms	Average Price: $160 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

701 Post Street

San Francisco, 94109 View map

3-Star Hotel Rank: 38 of 110
Average review rating: 4.12

OpinionWell Value Index: 4

Traveler reviews analyzed: BedBugRegistry (2) , Expedia (52) , Travelocity (6) , TripAdvisor (273) , YahooTravel (14)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (1/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	Recent comments complained about noise.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

avoid (2) bad (16) big deal (2) bit dated (2) complain (6) complaint (3) dated (17) difficult (4) dirty (3) disappoint (7) disturbing (2) downside (1) expensive (8) hard (8) hardly (3) horrible (2) irritate (2) issue (9) lack (2) loud (8) mess (2) nasty (2) negative (4) noise (66) noisy (20) outdated (6) peeling (2) poor (2) problem (26) rough (2) rude (2) shabby (4) slow (4) smell (14) smelly (1) stained (2) stale (2) tear (5) too small (1) ugly (1) uncomfortable (3) unfortunate (4) unhappy (1) unpleasant (4) unsafe (3) was a joke (1) worn (2) worst (3) would have liked (1) wrong (1)

Dated

Appears in 23 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Dated:
bad (2) bathroom (2) clean (7) decorate (3) furnish (2) good (2) hotel (3) room (10) suite (2)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. It is dated (built in 1910.

"Good value, comfortable, good location " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/3/2012 Vote

2. Very limited TV options on a dated TV.

"Not bad, nothing special " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/26/2012 Vote

3. Rooms were very dated, however clean.

"Not bad, nothing special " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/26/2012 Vote

4. I would describe the hotel as dated granderour.

"Good value & location " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/14/2012 Vote

5. Although our room was called a Junior Suite, but since it was only $159/night, I was concerned that it might be small and out of date.

"Pleasantly Surprised - Great Value " Read full review on TripAdvisor 11/19/2011 Vote

6. The rooms were quite dated but clean.

"Great location " Read full review on TripAdvisor 10/22/2011 Vote

7. Room quite dated.

"Good central location, although traffic noise was quite bad. " Read full review on TripAdvisor 9/9/2011 Vote

8. Bathtub in our Junior suite was nasty out-dated jacuzzi tub.

"It grew on me.... " Read full review on TripAdvisor 8/13/2011 Vote

9. The building its self is being kept in its original charming state, that would date back to early 1900's.

"Old school charm " Read full review on TripAdvisor 8/9/2011 Vote

10. While the location is good, the hotel rooms are dated, the walls are extremely thin and the customer service is pretty average.

"Average stay " Read full review on TripAdvisor 7/11/2011 Vote