Carefree Resort & Villas, Carefree, Issue

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » Arizona » Carefree Hotels » Carefree Resort & Villas

OpinionWell
Rank

1st

Out of 2

Carefree Resort & Villas	Average Daily Rate: NA Check Rates

Hotel Class:

37220 Mule Train Road

Carefree, 85377 View map

4-Star Hotel Rank: 1 of 1
Average review rating: 4.19

OpinionWell Value Index: NA

Traveler reviews analyzed: Expedia (72) , Travelocity (1)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (0/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	No recent comments about noise were found.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

bad (2) complaint (1) dingy (1) downside (1) gross (1) hard (2) issue (1) mold (1) negative (3) noise (2) noisy (1) outdated (1) poor (2) pricey (2) rock (1) sad (1) slow (1) smell (2) smelly (1) terrible (1) uncomfortable (2) unfortunate (2) unhappy (1)

Issue

Appears in 2 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Issue:
bed (2) bug (2)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

1. staff was nice but couldn't make up for the other issues.

"Snake in Room " Read full review on Expedia 9/26/2009 Vote

2. issues: - 20 minute wait to check-in - Bugs in bathtub, on floors, in BED - When told about the bugs, no one came - Finally, changed rooms in the middle of the night because my wife would not sleep in the bed - Bad service in the restaurant (tip was included in the check for only 2 people?) Sorry folks.

"Bugs & Bad Service " Read full review on Expedia 7/27/2006 Vote