Good Nite Inn Chula Vista, Chula Vista, Worn

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » California » Chula Vista Hotels » Good Nite Inn Chula Vista

OpinionWell
Rank

1st

Out of 16

Good Nite Inn Chula Vista	Average Daily Rate: NA Check Rates

Hotel Class:

225 Bay Boulevard

Chula Vista, 91910 View map

2-Star Hotel Rank: 1 of 15
Average review rating: 3.79

OpinionWell Value Index: NA

Traveler reviews analyzed: Expedia (110) , Travelocity (28)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (0/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	No recent comments about noise were found.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

avoid (1) awkward (1) bad (4) big deal (2) broke (1) chipped (1) complaint (2) cope (1) dated (1) dirty (2) disappoint (2) downside (1) expensive (3) hard (2) horrible (1) inconvenient (3) lack (1) loud (1) nasty (2) noise (3) noisy (1) poor (1) problem (11) roach (1) scary (1) slow (1) smell (9) unacceptable (1) uncomfortable (2) unhappy (1) unsafe (2) urine (1) weird (1) worn (2) worst (1)

Worn	Appears in 2 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Worn:
bed (2)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

1. The bed was extremely worn out and you sunk into it, which affected a restful sleep.

"No wash clothes! " Read full review on Expedia 9/29/2010 Vote

2. The blanket on the bed was very worn and seemed dirty and the router for the wireless internet did not work in my room.

"Frequent Visitor to this Hotel " Read full review on Expedia 7/21/2009 Vote