The Cliff Lodge and Spa, Snowbird, Difficult

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » Utah » Snowbird Hotels » The Cliff Lodge and Spa

OpinionWell
Rank

2nd

Out of 2

The Cliff Lodge and Spa	Average Daily Rate: NA Check Rates

Hotel Class:

Highway 210

Snowbird, 84092 View map

0-Star Hotel Rank: 1 of 1
Average review rating: 4.29

OpinionWell Value Index: NA

Traveler reviews analyzed: Expedia (46)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (0/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	No recent comments about noise were found.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

dated (1) difficult (2) dump (1) expensive (2) lack (1) lousy (1) negative (1) pricey (1) problem (1) terrible (1) ugly (1) would have liked (1)

Difficult

Appears in 3 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Difficult:
hotel (2) not (2)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

1. Skied here last May, most of the mountain was shut down and sking was difficult if not intimidating.

"redemption at last... " Read full review on Expedia 2/2/2010 Vote

2. The insulation from the cemet walls is so good, though, that it is difficult to keep the rooms on the upper floors cool.

"Best spot in Snowbird, but that’s not saying much. " Read full review on Expedia 2/13/2008 Vote

3. Also, shuttles back to hotel from slopes hard to find, and it can be a difficult walk from Snowbird Center to the hotel (not that long, but in the snow.

"OK - Not As Good As I Hoped " Read full review on Expedia 4/21/2006 Vote