Marriott Chicago Oak Brook, Oak Brook, Noise

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » Illinois » Oak Brook Hotels » Marriott Chicago Oak Brook

OpinionWell
Rank

4th

Out of 7

Marriott Chicago Oak Brook	Average Daily Rate: NA Check Rates

Hotel Class:

1401 West 22nd Street

Oak Brook, 60523 View map

3-Star Hotel Rank: 5 of 5
Average review rating: 4.5

OpinionWell Value Index: NA

Traveler reviews analyzed: Expedia (17) , MyTravelGuide (77)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (0/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	No recent comments about noise were found.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

bad (1) difficult (1) incorrect (1) lacking (1) mistake (1) noise (1) problem (1) tiny (1)

Noise

Appears in 3 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Noise:
annoy (2) conference (2) construction (2) lobby (2) much (2) pretty (2) roof (2)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

1. We had a problem with a constant, rhythmic squeaking noise in the ventilation system.

"Very Nice " Read full review on Expedia 6/6/2007 Vote

2. Only annoying things was the roof construction noise and the constant conferences and trade shows (they pretty much invade the entire lobby and crowd up the place).

Read full review on MyTravelGuide 4/27/2006 Vote

3. Only annoying things was the roof construction noise and the constant conferences and trade shows (they pretty much invade the entire lobby and crowd up the place).

Read full review on MyTravelGuide 4/27/2006 Vote