Hilton Indianapolis, Indianapolis, Pricey

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » Indiana » Indianapolis Destinations » Indianapolis Hotels » Hilton Indianapolis

OpinionWell
Rank

37th

Out of 274

Hilton Indianapolis	Average Price: $149 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

8181 North Shadeland Avenue

Indianapolis, 46250 View map

3-Star Hotel Rank: 22 of 71
Average review rating: 3.95

OpinionWell Value Index: 3

Traveler reviews analyzed: Expedia (37) , Travelocity (2) , TripAdvisor (71) , YahooTravel (5)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (0/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	No recent comments about noise were found.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

annoy (3) avoid (1) awful (1) bad (7) badly (1) big deal (2) complaint (3) crap (1) damage (1) dingy (1) dirty (1) disappoint (4) disgust (1) disturbing (2) downside (1) dumpy (1) expensive (2) hard (4) horrible (1) inconvenient (1) issue (6) lack (2) loud (4) lumpy (1) mess (2) mildew (1) miserable (2) mistake (1) negative (2) noise (12) noisy (3) overpriced (2) poor (1) pricey (2) problem (6) scary (1) shock (1) slow (1) smell (5) terrible (2) uncomfortable (2) unfortunate (2) worn (1) worst (1) wrong (3)

Pricey

Appears in 2 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Pricey:

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

1. Had a salad from the restaurant/lounge, pretty pricey, but it was late I didn't want to leave.

"Good location for interstate access " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/22/2010 Vote

2. Didn't dine in the hotel restaurant which was a little pricey compared to the very good local eateries.

"Not too bad... " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/17/2010 Vote