Fitzgerald Hotel Union Square, San Francisco, Bathroom

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » California » San Francisco Destinations » San Francisco Hotels » Fitzgerald Hotel Union Square

OpinionWell
Rank

134th

Out of 493

Fitzgerald Hotel Union Square	Average Price: $130 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

620 Post Street

San Francisco, 94109 View map

2-Star Hotel Rank: 34 of 119
Average review rating: 3.15

OpinionWell Value Index: 2

Traveler reviews analyzed: Expedia (12) , Travelocity (4) , TripAdvisor (102) , YahooTravel (12)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (1/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	No recent comments about noise were found.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	Recent comments complained about bed bugs.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

abysmal (1) accommodate (1) adequate (2) amenity (5) bar (11) bargain (1) bath (2) bathroom (14) bed (22) breakfast (40) cable (1) charge (1) check in (6) check out (1) check-out (1) closet (2) complimentary (1) concierge (1) cost (3) deal (1) decor (4) downtown (7) food (3) front desk (4) hotel (103) lobby (6) location (56) maid (1) money (3) parking (2) pillow (4) price (16) recommend (8) restaurant (14) room (124) service (8) sheets (2) shower (3) shuttle (2) staff (44) street (9) suite (3) to park (1) towel (3) tub (1) value (8) view (2) walk (18) water pressure (1) wireless (6)

Bathroom

Appears in 14 comments.

66% wrote positive comments about bathroom

The following words were used in comments with Bathroom:
clean (7) comfortable (2) large (3) location (2) love (2) need (2) nice (4) privacy (2)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. The room was clean enough, though that could be improved, and the bathroom was large and had everything you needed (including hairdrier, shampoo, soap and body lotion, all of which smelled pretty nice).

"Great little hotel, though with room for improvement " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/9/2012 Vote

2. Bathroom [en suite] was lovely and clean with very hot water!the hotel is located a few blocks up from Union Square, so there aren't any complaints with the location.

"Lovely room, great location. " Read full review on TripAdvisor 11/26/2011 Vote

3. Bathroom is nice, clean and comfortable.

"Chep, and definitley Cheerful! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 11/14/2011 Vote

4. The bed was comfortable, quiet, bathroom clean, and the staff downstairs were really lovely.

"I would recommend this place - cheap and cheerful " Read full review on TripAdvisor 8/5/2011 Vote

5. Bathroom was clean.

"excellent location, cheap good facilities " Read full review on TripAdvisor 6/24/2010 Vote

6. The rooms are small but they have everything you need, a confortable bed with two nice pillows, a large mirror to check yourself out before going out, and a nice and clean bathroom.

"Good experience at the Fitzgerald Hotel " Read full review on Travelocity 3/1/2010 Vote

7. Bathroom looked somehow tolerable, until the toilet blocked.

"Filthy, shabby, tiny. Better stay away of it!!! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 9/20/2010 Vote

8. Bathroom looked somehow tolerable, until the toilet blocked.

"Filthy, shabby, tiny. Better stay away of it!!! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 9/20/2010 Vote

9. No room to walk around at all, the bathroom had just enough room for a toilet and shower stall.

"Great location, but smallest room ever!!! " Read full review on Expedia 1/20/2010 Vote

10. The door on the bathroom was a glass door with no curtain or blinds or anything, which made privacy impossible.

"SO FUN! " Read full review on Travelocity 2/1/2009 Vote