Carl Hotel, San Francisco, Best

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » California » San Francisco Destinations » San Francisco Hotels » Carl Hotel

OpinionWell
Rank

201st

Out of 493

Carl Hotel	Average Daily Rate: NA Check Rates

Hotel Class:

198 Carl Street

San Francisco, 94117 View map

2-Star Hotel Rank: 77 of 119
Average review rating: 2.95

OpinionWell Value Index: NA

Traveler reviews analyzed: TripAdvisor (23) , YahooTravel (9)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (1/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	Recent comments complained about noise.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

affordable (2) ambience (1) amenity (1) area (4) bar (1) bathroom (6) bathtub (1) bed (5) bedroom (2) bedspread (1) best (1) big (1) big problem (1) bill (1) blanket (1) breakfast (1) bus (1) business (1) cable (1) car (2) carpet (2) chair (1) cheap (5) clean (13) closet (1) coffee (2) cold (1) comfortable (5) complain (1) condition (1) convenient (4) cost (1) discount (1) downtown (1) front desk (3) hotel (23) location (5) neighborhood (4) parking (2) price (3) recommend (4) restaurant (4) room (24) shower (2) staff (6) street (4) value (1) view (1) walk (7) wireless (1)

Best	Appears in 1 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Best:

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

1. A short walk to Golden Gate Park, Haight Street, SFSU, and some of the best restaurants in the city.

"Great value & location " Read full review on TripAdvisor 9/24/2009 Vote