Residence Inn Marriott Concord, Concord, Appearance

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » North Carolina » Concord Hotels » Residence Inn Marriott Concord

OpinionWell
Rank

5th

Out of 18

Residence Inn Marriott Concord	Average Daily Rate: NA Check Rates

Hotel Class:

7601 Scott Padgett Parkway

Concord, 28027 View map

3-Star Hotel Rank: 2 of 6
Average review rating: 5

OpinionWell Value Index: NA

Traveler reviews analyzed: Expedia (6)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (0/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	No recent comments about noise were found.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

amenity (1) appearance (1) beautiful (1) best (2) breakfast (1) buffet (1) clean (3) comfortable (1) continental (1) decor (1) driving (1) enjoyed (1) excellent (1) extremely (1) fabulous (1) facilities (2) fan (1) food (1) friendly (1) good (1) great (1) hot (1) hotel (5) internet (1) kitchen (1) larger (1) liked (1) loved (1) mall (1) modern (1) much (1) new (1) nice (4) night (1) pool (2) pool table (1) price (2) priced (1) queen (1) reasonably (1) return (1) room (9) spacious (1) staff (1) suite (2) traditional (1) us (1) wasn`t (1) workout room (1)

Appearance

Appears in 1 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Appearance:

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

1. I wasn’t able to use the kitchen facilities in the room, but they were neat clean and appeared brand new.

"Excellent Accomodations " Read full review on Expedia 8/25/2009 Vote