Hampton Inn Albany/Latham, Latham, Better

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » New York » Latham Hotels » Hampton Inn Albany/Latham

OpinionWell
Rank

2nd

Out of 16

Hampton Inn Albany/Latham	Average Daily Rate: NA Check Rates

Hotel Class:

981 New Loudon Road

Latham, 12047 View map

2-Star Hotel Rank: 2 of 12
Average review rating: 3.69

OpinionWell Value Index: NA

Traveler reviews analyzed: Expedia (20)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (0/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	No recent comments about noise were found.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

adequate (1) airport (1) area (3) arrival (2) attitude (1) baby (1) bar (2) bathroom (5) bed (5) best (1) better (1) blanket (1) breakfast (8) business trip (1) cable (1) carpet (1) chair (1) children (1) clean (5) cleanliness (1) clerk (1) coffee (1) comfortable (6) complimentary (1) continental (1) convenient (1) coupons (2) decent (1) delicious (1) disabled (1) easy (2) entrance (1) exceptional (2) extremely (3) food (1) hotel (12) housekeeping (1) lobby (4) location (1) money (1) pillow (1) pool (1) recommend (1) room (18) staff (6) suite (1) towel (1) value (1) wireless (1) workout room (1)

Better

Appears in 1 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Better:

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

1. The continental breakfast was better than most I've seen, with a good variety and quality of foods.

"Not fancy but good value " Read full review on Expedia 5/14/2009 Vote