Sleep Inn & Suites Buckhead, Atlanta, Room

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » Georgia » Atlanta Destinations » Atlanta Hotels » Sleep Inn & Suites Buckhead

OpinionWell
Rank

109th

Out of 426

Sleep Inn & Suites Buckhead	Average Price: $105 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

800 Sidney Marcus Boulevard NorthEast

Atlanta, 30324 View map

2-Star Hotel Rank: 26 of 82
Average review rating: 4.48

OpinionWell Value Index: 6

Traveler reviews analyzed: Expedia (25) , MyTravelGuide (2) , Travelocity (5) , TripAdvisor (13) , YahooTravel (2)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (0/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	No recent comments about noise were found.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

$ (2) aaa (1) above average (1) accommodate (2) adequate (2) affordable (2) amenity (1) bar (1) bath (1) bathroom (4) bed (9) breakfast (19) charge (2) check in (7) closet (2) complimentary (4) decor (1) downtown (4) fee (1) food (1) front desk (7) gym (1) highway (2) hot tub (1) hotel (56) housekeeping (1) interstate (1) lobby (7) location (13) maid (1) money (4) parking (10) pillow (3) pool (4) price (4) rate (5) recommend (6) restaurant (9) room (41) service (8) shower (4) shuttle (4) staff (23) street (3) suite (9) value (2) view (1) walk (4) water pressure (1) wireless (2)

Room	Appears in 40 comments. 83% wrote positive comments about room

The following words were used in comments with Room:
clean (7) comfortable (4) free (3) friendly (3) hotel (8) internet (3) large (3) liked (5) location (5) nice (7) plenty (3) rating (3) small (4) smaller (3) staff (3) well (4)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. The room was well maintained and clean.

"A very pleasant stay " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/12/2010 Vote

2. The location is convenient to 85 north/south and the room was affordable.

"At least the cookies were good! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/23/2010 Vote

3. - Great rooms - In all fairness, I was alone.

"What a pleasant surprise!! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/23/2010 Vote

4. Pros: room was affordable (especially with AAA rate), had a flat screen on the wall, free wi-fi and conveniently located to 85 N/S.

"At least the cookies were good! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/23/2010 Vote

5. Great hotel the moment you step in you feel so comfortable, the rooms are beautiful, very nice area and surroundings real quiet, not much traffic, accesible, close to downtown, close to MARTA train, plenty of restaurants and shopping places withing walking distance.

"Great place to stay!! " Read full review on Expedia 11/11/2009 Vote

6. The room was very nice, comfortable double beds, flat screen tv, nice furniture, accommodating excercise room and free internet service.

"Very, very nice " Read full review on Travelocity 10/1/2009 Vote

7. Breakfast was nice, the staff was friendly, and the room was very clean.

"Great place to stay " Read full review on Expedia 9/25/2009 Vote

8. The room was modest but well appointed and clean.

"Compassionate and professional staff. " Read full review on TripAdvisor 8/19/2009 Vote

9. Friendly, helpful staff; good continental breakfast; excellent technology in the room; apparently recently refurbished with very nice furniture, etc..

"Great hotel " Read full review on Expedia 8/5/2009 Vote

10. We stayed in a 1 bedroom suite--the living room was big enough to accommodate my oldest daughter, who is in a wheelchair and I had not requested an accessible room.

"A wonderful stay! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 8/1/2009 Vote