La Quinta Charlotte, Charlotte, Bathroom

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » North Carolina » Charlotte Destinations » Charlotte Hotels » La Quinta Charlotte

OpinionWell
Rank

44th

Out of 269

La Quinta Charlotte	Average Price: $79 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

3127 Sloan Drive

Charlotte, 28208 View map

2-Star Hotel Rank: 5 of 88
Average review rating: 3.89

OpinionWell Value Index: 7

Traveler reviews analyzed: Expedia (26) , MyTravelGuide (14) , Travelocity (10) , TripAdvisor (73) , YahooTravel (3)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (0/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	No recent comments about noise were found.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

bath (3) bathroom (21) bed (34) bill (1) breakfast (56) charge (3) check in (13) checkout (2) complimentary (2) cost (3) deal (2) decor (3) dinner (3) discount (4) downtown (8) exercise room (2) fee (6) fitness room (2) food (5) front desk (21) highway (2) hotel (129) housekeeping (2) interstate (2) lobby (6) location (25) manager (2) money (4) neighborhood (6) parking (6) pillow (17) pool (4) price (21) rate (10) recommend (12) restaurant (13) room (136) service (17) sheets (3) shower (5) shuttle (23) staff (42) street (5) towel (2) tub (5) valet (1) value (8) view (1) walk (6) wireless (2)

Bathroom

Appears in 21 comments.

25% wrote positive comments about bathroom

The following words were used in comments with Bathroom:
clean (7) comfy (2) fan (4) floor (2) hotel (2) plenty (2)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. Small Bathrooms.

"OKAY " Read full review on TripAdvisor 8/9/2010 Vote

2. Bathroom was small, odd soap holder placement in very narrow tub (shoulder height, stuck out several inches, impossible to avoid bumping it during shower), plenty of hot water.

"Pretty good budget motel " Read full review on TripAdvisor 6/25/2010 Vote

3. The entrance and the bathroom floors were made of hard wood.

"A wonderful experience " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/12/2010 Vote

4. There was no bathroom fan (I know that's an issue for some) but the artwork and the finish on the room were very good for a travel-type hotel (cherry finish in my room).

"Nice Big Beds " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/28/2009 Vote

5. Semi-Cons: no fan in the bathroom, we couldn't figure out how to keep the AC fan running to drown out the folks in the room next door who talked past 1am, and the breakfast ended at 9am, which was not convenient for those of us trying to sleep in because the neighbors kept us up.

"Great value, but a little loud " Read full review on TripAdvisor 10/17/2010 Vote

6. The bathroom was pristine.

"A wonderful experience " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/12/2010 Vote

7. It seems that in the course of doing some plumbing work at the hotel, something went wrong and dirty water was piped into the tub and bathroom sink.

"Comedy of Errors " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/31/2009 Vote

8. The rooms were very nice--we had a sofa and an octagonal bathroom--but the best part was the beds, which were king-size and southeastern-style, with layers of cotten and wool blankets over a thick mattress cover.

"Nice Big Beds " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/28/2009 Vote

9. The bathrooms are updated and everything was clean.

"Great place to stay " Read full review on TripAdvisor 2/16/2009 Vote

10. The door lock on the bathroom was from the outside of it so you could accidentally get locked into the bathroom.

"great price and better than expected " Read full review on TripAdvisor 11/13/2008 Vote